
I had plans for
a Christmas-themed blog post, but all that went out the window with the stomach
flu.
On the upside, however, when I wasn’t in the bathroom getting sick, I had
plenty of time to lie in bed and think about the year in film. Yes, once again,
superhero movies made a kajillion dollars, Bond returned on the franchise’s 50th
anniversary, the hobbits are back and apparently there was another Twilight movie. But my feverish thoughts
kept returning to one thing: guns.
Violence,
particularly gun violence, has overshadowed everything in 2012, due to the
shooting at a Dark Knight midnight screening
in July, in which twelve people died and 58 were wounded, and the Newtown
school shooting, in which 26 people, mostly children, were murdered, prompting
the NRA (National Rifle Association) to both call for armed guards in school
and blame violent movies and video games for the tragedy. Blaming movies for
the ills of society goes way back; for example, the Motion Picture Production Code
(a.k.a. Hays Code) from 1930, which laid out guidelines to censor things such
as “brutality and possible gruesomeness” and “the use of firearms.” In the wake
of the Newtown shootings, the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America)
promised, in a
vague press release, that it is ready to take action. The NRA, meanwhile,
went on the offensive against cries for gun control, and in a press conference,
spokesman Wayne LaPierre blamed “blood-soaked” video games and, ironically, Natural Born Killers (1984) and American Psycho (2000).
I
say ironically because these films aren’t pro-violence at all. The former is a
cartoonish – and very prescient – look at violence and the media, how one fuels
the other and glamourizes death dealers. The latter is a dark comedy satirizing
1980s Regan America (made by Canadian director Mary Harron). The NRA was
obviously making a very important statement to the world, so why pick those
films? Why not choose something contemporary that glamourizes violence, such as
Skyfall or The Expendables 2? No film series in the word has done more to make
firearms sexy and cool than the James Bond movies; the stylized credits for
every film feature a mix of tuxedos, beautiful women, killing and Bond’s
Walther pistol. The Expendables 2 is
an orgy of tough guy gunplay and one-liners, completely glorifying extreme
brutality.
Well,
as this Business
Insider piece points out, the
most important product placement (out of many) in the Bond franchise is the
gun, and the NRA certainly doesn’t want to alienate one of the companies that
manufactures guns and most likely supports its organization. Given the buffet
of weaponry in the Expendables films,
the problem would be tenfold. An EW
article from 1999 titled Where Hollywood Gets Its
Guns details the close relationship between gun companies and Hollywood, noting,
“In fact, for years now, the adversarial gun and film industries have
indirectly been in business together, using each other to sell their products
even as they cudgel one another on the op-ed pages” – and there’s no reason to
think that’s changed. American Psycho
is a safer one for the NRA to pick because main character Patrick Bateman’s
weapons of choice are things such as a bat, a hatchet, a chainsaw and a nail-gun.
And Natural Born Killers has long
been accused of causing violence, including the Columbine Massacre.
The
movie is clearly a reaction to
violence, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be a trigger. Then again, Charles
Manson was murderously influenced by Beatles’ lyrics, so do you blame the
Manson Family’s crimes on “Helter Skelter?” While violent media can, with
certain individuals, exacerbate violent tendencies and fuel violent fantasies,
most of the time it serves the opposite effect. One of the best books on the subject
is Jeffrey
A. Kottler’s The Lust for Blood: Why We
Are Fascinated by Death, Murder, Horror and Violence. It’s an
intelligent, fascinating and well-reasoned looked at humanity’s savage side and
how we deal with it. As he points out, we’ve evolved socially and technologically
much more quickly than we’ve evolved physically and emotionally, which means
that we’re still driven by those animal instincts that allowed us to survive
and flourish. Yet we’re not a Klingon-like warrior society, and that’s because
we’ve learned how to supress and channel those violent tendencies into things
such as sports and other adrenaline-releasing activities such as riding
rollercoasters, video games and movies. So, while The Expendables films are mindless celebrations of violence, they
serve an important purpose.
We
need our violent fantasies as an outlet to avoid violent realities. And if you
think we’ve become more violent, as Kottler notes, consider that before cinema,
people entertained themselves by throwing Christians to the lions, with fight-to-the-death
gladiator sports and attending public torture and executions.
This
brings us back to 2012, though, and these horrific mass shootings. There’s
always going to be a desire and a need for violent entertainment, so laying blame
and censoring entertainment is pointless, especially in an age where most kids
know how to download anything online. The obvious solution is more gun control
in the U.S. In a piece
for Deadlie.com, Mike Fleming Jr. makes a very important point about the
issue. “Those ‘blood-soaked films’ the NRA refers to are now digested by
worldwide audiences. Spend five minutes on Google and you come away with some
interesting questions. Why is it that in 2008, for instance, there were 12,000
gun homicides in the U.S., compared with 42 in Great Britain and 11 in Japan,
where kids are watching the same films and playing the same games.”
Speaking
as a former gun owner, from a family of gun owners, who loves going to the
shooting range and looking at the museum pieces at gun shows, some of the gun
control efforts in Canada have been ridiculous when it comes to things like
excessively policing things such as farmers’ rifles and shotguns. But there’s
no reason that assault rifles, the weapon of choice for mass shootings, should
be easy to obtain. The numbers don’t lie: gun control works. As this
article from the December 4 Vancouver Sun
points out, this year, the number of Canadian deaths related to firearms
hit its lowest point in 50 years. Yes, 50 years... that is astounding.
When
it comes to the U.S., though, firearms are so commonplace that even if they
were banned for sale tomorrow, there would still be more than enough to allow
them to be obtained easily for generations to come. Currently, it’s estimated
that there’s more than one gun per person in the U.S. but it’s hard to say
definitively because you don’t have to register them in most states.
But
guns have been around a long time, so what’s behind this spike in mass-murder
over the past fifteen years? I think Roger Ebert hit the nail on the head in
his review
of Gus Van Sant’s Elephant (a
movie about a Columbine-like killing spree), which was recently linked to on Boingboing.net
in the wake of Newtown:
[I]f they are
influenced by anything, [they] are influenced by news programs… . When an
unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major
media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock
with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were
packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids
around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk
about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking.
The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn't have messed with me. I'll
go out in a blaze of glory.
To
prove his point, I stumbled across this
“news” story, published months after the Dark Knight theatre shooting, about a romance the (alleged) killer
had with a grad student. It has a huge photo of the (alleged) killer, his name
in the headline and link to a gallery of pictures of him. This is the kind of irresponsible
tabloid reporting usually reserved for the actors in Twilight. The murderer is given the same kind of attention as an
A-list celebrity, so no wonder others of a similar mindset would latch onto
murder sprees as a way to leave their mark on the world. The media is
complicit. It works.
Most
newspapers have policies about reporting on suicides; they either don’t report
on them unless it’s someone notable, or they don’t print the person’s name.
There needs to be a similar set of guidelines laid out for these types of mass killings,
to curb the cult of celebrity surrounding them. I didn’t mention either of the
shooters names here for good reason; I don’t want to give add to their notoriety.
Discuss, don’t sensationalize. Even if it is human nature to obsess over
violence, it’s also human nature to self-preserve, so let’s stop encouraging
more shooters. Let’s evolve.
This
year brought with it some heart-wrenching, pointless violence, but to blame
movies is to fail to understand the problem. Violent films keep violence in the
fantasy world; idolizing murderers brings it into the real world.
Here’s
to a safer 2013.
-Dave
Alexander